My friends Austin Hill and Alex Eberts have launched Gifter.org, an experiment in social giving. Visitors to the site can either make a wish, or sponsor one. To sponsor a wish, you simply donate an amount of your choosing to a charity of your choice — what can be simpler? Each dollar you donate sponsors one wish.

The goal is to raise a million dollars for charity. After trying to figure out the site’s business model (there isn’t one) or the future business model of Austin and Alex’s Project Ojibwe, I realized I was missing the point. Who cares? They’re encouraging people to give to charity, and that’s good enough for me.

Seeds of peaceSo here’s my receipt. $500 for Seeds of Peace. The organization runs a camp in Maine which brings together teenagers from conflict regions and equips them with leadership skills to promote reconciliation and coexistence. After graduating from the camp, alumni continue to contribute towards advancing these goals in their respective communities.

A recent trip to Israel and Egypt reinforced my belief that a lasting, durable peace (however difficult or far off it may seem under the current circumstances) cannot be achieved by politicians alone but also needs to involve grassroots links between everyday citizens of different countries. Think of it as crowdsourcing for a good cause.

Please take a few moments to visit Gifter.org to either sponsor or make a wish. Happy holidays, everyone, and see you in 2007.

Updated: As a Canadian, I can’t benefit from the tax deductibility of this donation, but that’s tempered by the fact that board member David Avital has offered to match any donations received by December 31st of  this year.

Comments

9 Responses to “Blogging for a good cause”

  1. Austin Hill on December 22nd, 2006 6:07 pm

    Hey George,

    Thanks so much for the support and the support of a great organization.

    Looking forward to sitting down in the New Year.

    Kala Christougenna kai kali protoxoronia.

    -Austin

  2. When you wish upon a Z-List » Billions With Zero Knowledge on December 27th, 2006 6:19 pm

    […] George Favvas - 500 wishes […]

  3. Coinutsdiutty on November 27th, 2007 12:11 pm

    Hi, hello, privet
    toyota partc p

  4. Idetrorce on December 15th, 2007 10:45 pm

    very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
    Idetrorce

  5. werutzb on October 7th, 2008 10:24 pm

    Hi!

    I want to improve my SQL capabilities.
    I red so many SQL books and want to
    read more about SQL for my occupation as db2 database manager.

    What would you recommend?

    Thanks,
    Werutz

  6. Uncelmcom on December 7th, 2008 8:46 am

    In most cases a product’s rating went down, expanding the range between highest and lowest rated.Unlike Kaspersky, Symantec provides Norton users with little explanation of its features or settings, either in the configuration settings or on its technical support section. Also we don’t like Norton’s dependency on Internet Explorer to explain Help items or services provided by Symantec (windows pop up in IE even when Firefox is your default browser), or that fee-based services have once again crept into the technical support section. Having improved a lot
    last year in Symantec’s flagship antivirus product, it makes sense we’d see more modest enhancements for this year’s Norton AntiVirus 2008. While Norton
    AntiVirus.

  7. inenuegyclila on December 19th, 2008 5:11 am

    Hi

    As newly registered user i only wanted to say hello to everyone else who uses this board :-)

  8. GapTycleDycle on January 7th, 2009 1:31 am

    What is bumburbia?

  9. osobo on February 18th, 2009 1:59 am

    ????? ?????? ???????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ????? ?. ?????

    ????? ?????? “????????” ???, ??? ?????? ??????????? ? ???????? ???????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????????? ?????? ???????? ?????????????????? ?????? ?.?. ?????.
    ?????????????? ?? ?????? ??????, ? ????-?? “?????” ?????????? ??????? ?????? “?????????” ??? ?????, ??????? ???????? ???????? ? ????????????? ???? ????????? ??????????.
    ???????? “????????” ? ?????????? ??????? - ??? ????????, ??????? ??????? ???????? ?? ?????. ????? ???? ??????????? “?????? ???????” ? ???????? ???????????? ??? ????????????? ????????????, ????????????? ????????? ?????, ? ????, ???? ??????????? ???.
    ????? ??????? ?????????? ?????? ????????? 1 ????? ??????????-????????? ????? ? 9 ?????????? ?? ????????? ????????????? ???? ?????????? ??????? ?? ???????? ?????????? ????????????? ??????? ?.?. ???????.
    ? ??? ??? ? ?? ?????, ????? ????????? ??? ?????? ???????? ?????????????????? ??????? ? ??????????? ???? ?????????? ???????? ?????? ? ???????? ???????. ? ??? ????? ??????? ????????? ? ??????????? ????? “? ???????” - ?? ?????? 11 ????? ?????? ????????? ?????? 25 ? 35, ?? ????????? ??????? ????? ?????????????????? ?????? ????? ????? ????????? ?????????-????????????? ???????????? ???????????.
    ?????, ?? ?????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ??????? ?????????????????? ?????? ?? ??????????. ? ?? ??????? ???????????? ? ????????????? ??????????.
    ????? ????, ??? ?????????? ????????? ?? ? ?????????? ???????? ??????????, ? ????? ? ???????? ? ?????????? ???????????? ????????????????

Leave a Reply