fintech, social media and entrepreneurship
Why I Think Google Will Offer Free Hosting
Mar 31st
About a month ago I had coffee with a friend, a systems administrator who pitched me on his plan to provide managed web services for clients. Where was he going to host everything? He had a relationship with a local data center. Who in their right mind would invest in hosting infrastructure, I asked him, when Google has already figured it all out and will sooner or later offer this for free? He gave me a puzzled look.
You can argue that Google is already there with Google Page Creator and Google Sites, but there’s no doubt in my mind Google will start offering a free hosting platform that will rival — and likely surpass — Amazon Web Services.
Dave Winer has written two posts on the subject of a hypothetical Google Web Services. From reading the comments, it seems a lot of people are still skeptical about this happening. Let me explain why I think Dave is right.
The picture you see here is of Google’s entire server park from 1999 — ten CPU’s across four servers. Google has come a long way since then, building up a massive global server infrastructure. A 2006 estimate is that they had in the ballpark of half a million servers across the globe. Gartner last year estimated Google has a million servers. How is this all possible?
Google Adwords is a killer cash cow for Google. The profit from the Adwords franchise, which represents nearly all of Google’s revenue, more than covers the cost of their infrastructure several times over. For all intents and purposes, therefore, Google’s incremental cost to add new applications to its cloud is zero.
It’s not like going free would be without precedent. Google Analytics is a prime example of how they’ve done it before. Google purchased Urchin and promptly reduce its price from $499 per month to $199. They later made it free by invitation only and with a five domain limit. Today, the application is completely free, with no restrictions or limitations.
A more recent example is Google Ad Manager, a new ad serving platform which is by invitation only — for now. Then there’s Google Apps for Domains, Google Website Optimizer, Google Earth… all applications that people were used to paying for before Google made them free. Why would hosting be any different?
Google has already won the battle for search engine market share. So how do they keep up the revenue growth the market expects of them? Here are a few ways:
- Increase CPC’s
In 2006, Google launched a new quality score algorithm and revenue up 70% and profit doubled. Yup, leave it to Google to help you bid against yourself. Last month, Google started piloting something called automatic matching, which lets Google sell you clicks on keywords you didn’t even bid on. - Increase ad inventory
Wikipedia is great, but stubbornly refuses to run Adsense. Enter Google Knol. Google Ad Manager helps here, too. But Adwords is not limited to the web. You can now use the interface to buy ads on the radio, in print publications and even on TV. - Place bets on what the next big thing could be
The next big thing could very well come from within Google, and the company has not been shy to hire legions of programmers with the hope that one of these teams will strike gold. But what if it comes from the outside. Google’s covering that, too, with equity investments in startups. Offering a hosting platform would make sense also, which would let startups focus more on creating new applications as opposed to the nuts and bolts of managing hardware and networks.
So how will Google roll out their hosting offering? A logical start could be to offer free hosting to sites with Adsense on their pages. Or free hosting for, say, your first million or so hits monthly. And they’ll go from there.
One way or another, the move is inevitable. And until it happens, I for one won’t be investing in massive server infrastructure.
What Yahoo! Pipes teaches us about entrepreneurship
Feb 20th
Almost as interesting as the launch of Yahoo!’s Pipes service — which lets users create their own feeds by combining and processing multiple RSS feeds – is the way in which the project came about. A quick look at the Pipes site and it’s easy to miss the association with Yahoo! The site uses Yahoo! accounts for user management, and sports a tiny “this is Yahoo!” icon at the bottom of the home page, but otherwise does not fit the typical model of what a Yahoo! property looks like, what is does, nor how it integrates with its Yahoo! siblings.
The major web properties have a history of maintaining distinct brands for popular web properties. Yahoo’s Flickr and Google’s Youtube are prime examples. But these are all properties which were launched independantly and managed to build strong brand awareness before being acquired by their parent.
Pipes, on the other hand, is a Yahoo! baby from the start. It was incubated within Yahoo!’s new Brickhouse division, physically located away from the Yahoo! campus, where teams are given more freedom to think outside the box and experiment.
An article by BusinessWeek, points out how Yahoo! has acknowledged the risks that come with being big:
Yahoo’s brand is another challenge. People associate the company and its trademark yodel with one of the Web’s prime destinations for mail, news, entertainment, and search. But Yahoo’s status as an established, family-oriented, commercial brand can turn away some cutting-edge users.
The article goes on to state that Yahoo! plans to launch additional products off-brand.
Google is known for allowing their staff to spend 20% of their time on personal projects, but the projects that even see the light tend often languish on the Google Labs page.
Yahoo!, on the other hand, is demonstrating a real commitment to allowing innovation to not only take place internally, but also to launch. They are getting edgier and taking more risks. They’re getting traction with new uses of community and social networking concepts — witness the early popularity of Yahoo! Answers, launched as as Google pulled the plug on its equivalent. In short, they are being entrepreneurial. This is great news for Yahoo! and entrepreneurs everywhere who can take a page from their book. Where they go from here will be fun to watch.
Tags: Yahoo, Yahoo Pipes, Brickhouse, Entrepreneurship, Flickr, Youtube, RSS, Yahoo Answers, Google, Google Answers
Google AdWords to implement quality score “update” on content network
Nov 7th
Google’s at it (again). An ominous warning on the Inside AdWords tells us Google is on the verge of implenting its use of “quality score” to set minimum bids on web sites in its content network. The post reads in part:
In the next few days, we will be making two changes to how AdWords evaluates landing page quality. First, we’ll begin incorporating landing page quality into the Quality Score for your contextually-targeted ads, using the same evaluation process as we do for ads showing on Google.com and the search network. Advertisers who may be providing a poor experience on their site will notice that their traffic across the content network decreases as a result of this change. Second, we’re improving our algorithm for evaluating landing page quality and incorporating landing page content retrieved by the AdWords system.
Last July, Google wreaked havoc on search marketers by setting new minimum bids for advertisers whose landing pages it deemed to be of low quality. Though the notorious Made For AdSense sites and friends deserved, in my view, what they had coming, Google’s actions didn’t pass the smell test.
For one, the timing was suspicious as it came on the heels of Google’s testing of a cost per action model, to the detriment of many of the affiliate marketers their update was squeezing out of the market. And if Google was really concerned about landing page quality then why allow these advertisers to pay a ransom and have their ads remain active? And why deactivate the offenders on Google’s site only but allow the ads to be syndicated across Google’s network of third party content sites?
This week’s upcoming update addressed at least the last point, by treating ads on both networks in the same manner. How you been affected by the quality score update? What, if any, changes did you make to your site as a result?
Google suggest
Oct 21st
In the rush to jump onto the Web 2.0 badwagon, some of the most effective uses of AJAX are still the simplest. Google suggest — which refines your query with up to ten suggestions as you type — tops my list. I’ve experimented with it as my browser default page for the past week and, despite causing the occasional IE crash, am finding it to be a remarkable time saver. Not to mention a good source for keyword variations for seach engine marketing purposes.
